tarts
Home | Archive | RSS | Random
About | Images | Audio | Tags


cass, 21, living with hysteria. hello

all girls should have a poem
written for them even if
we have to turn this god-damn world
upside down to do it
--richard brautigan

LADY BANDS: for people who like their music with vaginas in it

email + @tarts + last.fm

radio silence? try my travelogue.

this page looks icky in ie. switch to firefox!

Stephen Fry on Writing - Emerging into the Light

Cut and pasted from here:

A deadline met: such relief. You would think that after so many years I might have mastered the art – not of writing – but of putting myself in a position to write. Many writers are, like me, fascinated by process. From an early age I wanted to know whether authors worked by morning or night, whether they typed or wrote by hand and if so on what kind of paper, whether they had their backs to the window, drank wine, sat, stood or lay on their backs with their legs in the air.

I don’t profess to understand the reasons, but I work best in the mornings. And by mornings I mean mornings. When I have any serious piece of writing to complete I start by getting up early, about 6 say, and I sit in front of my computer screen till mid-afternoon. As the days pass the hour of rising becomes earlier and earlier until I’m going to bed at 7 or 8 at night and flinging back the duvet ready to write at 4 or even 3 in the morning.

In the old days I used a manual typewriter until I graduated to a golfball and finally one of those Brother machines that could keep a whole line in RAM before printing it out. I usually scribbled in longhand first, something I still often do. In 1982 I bought a BBC Acorn for £399. It came complete with a firmware programme called Wordwise which I adored and which, in my fond memory, was the best word processor ever. I used it to write the book (ie story and dialogue) of a stage musical, saving on cassette tape as I went along and finally outputting to a daisywheel printer. The show was enough of a hit to allow me to indulge my passion for computer gadgetry for the rest of my life. I still tremble at the insanity which propelled me to outlay £7,000 on an Apple Laserwriter in the autumn of 1984. But the gear, gadgets and gismos were ultimately irrelevant of course. It was all about coffee and cigarettes. Sitting in a study in Norfolk, curtains drawn (I cannot bear natural light when I’m writing), staring at that flashing I-beam on the screen. Cursing at the cursor.

Other writers may have written in the afternoons, used school exercise books and coloured pencils, sipped water and gazed out of the window but my way was my way and by the time I had written my first novel a kind of superstition told me that it would be tempting providence to change. I might frighten off those shy Muses. So, aside from the miracle of managing to give up cigarettes two and half years ago, I have kept to the same system. Well, system is hardly the word. But … it’s still so bloody difficult. I may always have been weirdly fascinated by the processes and outward routines of other writers, but deeper than that I really needed to know how much they too grunted, swore and howled at the sheer horror of having to write. “I sit at the typewriter and curse a bit,” said one of my earliest literary heroes, P. G. Wodehouse. Was he a special case?

I began writing seriously when I was about thirteen. Out streamed poetry, stories and novels, the latter of which were always aborted early, usually half way through the second chapter. It took my friend Douglas Adams to encourage me to go further and he did this by pointing out that the reason I had never managed to finish a novel was that I had never properly understood how difficult, how ragingly and absurdly difficult, it is to do. “It is almost impossibly hard,” he told me. It is supposed to be. But once you truly understand how difficult it is,” he added, with signature paradoxicality, “it all becomes a lot easier.” It was many years later that Clive James quoted to me Thomas Mann’s superb crystallisation of this “A writer,” said Mann, “is a person for whom writing is more difficult than for other people.” How liberating that definition is. If any of you out there have ever been put off writing it might well be because you found it so insanely hard and therefore, like me, gave up and abandoned your masterworks early, regretfully assuming that you weren’t cut from the right cloth, that it must come more easily to true, natural-born writers. Perhaps you can start again now, in the knowledge that since the whole experience was so grindingly horrible you might be the real thing after all. Of course finding it difficult and managing to complete are just the first stages. They are what earn you the uniform and the brass buttons, as it were. They don’t guarantee that what you complete is any good, or even readable. That is quite a different kettle of wax, a whole other ball of fish.

You might notice below that another of my peculiar writing habits is to leave off shaving while the authorial fever is upon me. I believe Tolstoy and Gertrude Stein were the same. Pip pip.

(via thesophie)

Comments (View) | 27 notes
Reblogged from thesophie.
Tags: writing

Saturday, September 5th 2009 9:13am

"I look back over what I’ve written and I know it’s wrong, not because of what I’ve set down, but because of what I’ve omitted. What isn’t there has a presence, like the absence of light.
You want the truth, of course. You want me to put two and two together. But two and two doesn’t necessarily get you the truth. Two and two equals a voice outside the window. Two and two equals the wind. The living bird is not its labelled bones."

- Margaret Atwood, The Blind Assassin (via cankerbloxxom)

Comments (View) | 4 notes
Reblogged from cankerbloxxom.

Wednesday, August 5th 2009 10:19pm

 (via saurie, hangthelights, phantomwise, loveyourchaos)

This probably explains why I feel so mentally constipated right now. I think I need some bran.

(via saurie, hangthelights, phantomwise, loveyourchaos)

This probably explains why I feel so mentally constipated right now. I think I need some bran.

Comments (View) | 117 notes
Reblogged from with all my blah.
Tags: writing

Monday, August 3rd 2009 10:35pm

"I must write with more love, no matter the restraint so much a part of my inheritance as a white writer in Africa. Love: it is an aching word. It embarrasses, partly because when we read it, it represents the husk of a long ago emotion. But love is danger, and bravery, something Pivin courted when he wrote, right at the start of things, that Revue Noire is “an unconditional act of love proving that beauty is our life and we all have the same trust for it”."

- chimurenga library: Revue Noire (via igather)

Comments (View) | 3 notes
Reblogged from You don't know me ay?.
Tags: writing

Wednesday, July 22nd 2009 2:54am

I want a name for the state

fiddlersgreen:

Of knowing that everything you write, do or become at this undiscernible point in this ongoing phase is just a rough draft, an x-ray, a sketch, an in-between, the irrhythmical flickering before dark becomes light. And with this knowing an accompanying acceptance of this state because you are patient and you can wait, even if you feel no one else can or will.

Let me name this.

Let me know when you do.

Comments (View) | 8 notes
Reblogged from oh freckle freckle.
Tags: writing

Saturday, July 11th 2009 3:32am

Roald Dahl (and Hemingway) on writing

“One of the vital things for a writer who’s writing a book, which is a lengthy project and is going to take about a year, is how to keep the momentum going. It is the same with a young person writing an essay. They have got to write four or five or six pages. But when you are writing for a year, you go away and have to come back. I never come back to a blank page; I always finish about halfway through. To be confronted with a blank page is not very nice.

“But Hemingway, a great American writer, taught me the finest trick when doing a long book, which is, he simply said in his own words, “When you are going good, stop writing.” And that means that if everything’s going well and you know exactly where the end of the chapter’s going to go and you know just what the people are going to do, you don’t go on writing and writing until you come to the end of it, because when you do, then you say, well, where am I going to go next? And you get up and you walk away and you don’t want to come back because you don’t know where you want to go.

“But if you stop when you’re going good, as Hemingway said…then you know what you are going to say next. You make yourself stop, put your pencil down and everything, and you walk away. And you can’t wait to get back because you know what you want to say next and that’s lovely and you have to try and do that. Every time, every day all the way through the year. If you stop when you are stuck, then you are in trouble!”

(via unicornology: hwee: mutations: stayforthecredits)

Comments (View) | 107 notes
Reblogged from HOLY SHIT, IT'S A FUCKING RAINBOW..
Tags: writing

Thursday, July 2nd 2009 5:01am

Listen. Writing

technicoloring:

is not composed of letters or syllables or words. It’s not rhymes, or literary devices, or sequences or pentameter or flow, it isn’t haphazard patterns of squiggles to fill up pages and brains with nonsense, it doesn’t follow pattern and it knows no prejudice. It is never about threading nice sounds together to produce a string of pointless, pretty babble, and anybody who believes it is so does not deserve to understand it anyway. It isn’t something you calculate. Not precisely, anyway. It’s not organization, it’s not planning drafts for hours and hours on end - it’s not something to be captured, cornered, confined into a certain number of lines and a designated essay prompt. Writing isn’t miscellaneous thoughts scribbled down by ink and pixels, either. It isn’t you trying to be grand, or philosophical and righteous and deep, because all that is gained is a polluted air of pretentiousness. If you truly write,

then you write to express. You write to create. Because you walk past something on the street and you just know, there’s a story there, and you want to be the one to tell it. Because it gnaws at you for weeks until you do. Because as long as you’re doing this, you’re sane. You write because you feel such a pull towards it - this silly arrangement of symbols on a page - and the one thing you want in the whole entire world is for it all to mean something, perhaps, just

maybe, something true.

Comments (View) | 13 notes
Reblogged from ♫ ♪.
Tags: writing

Monday, June 29th 2009 9:13pm

pete tarslaw's 16 rules of novel writing

  • rule 1: abandon truth.
  • rule 2: write a popular book. do not waste energy making it a good book.
  • rule 3: include nothing from [one’s] own life.
  • rule 4: must include a murder.
  • rule 5: must include a club, secrets / mysterious missions, shy characters, characters whose lives are changed suddenly, surprising love affairs, women who’ve given up on love but turn out to be beautiful.
  • rule 6: evoke confusing sadness at the end.
  • rule 7: prose should be lyrical.
  • rule 8: novel must have scenes on highways, making driving seem poetic and magical.
  • rule 9: at dull points include descriptions of delicious meals.
  • rule 10: main character is miraculously liberated from a lousy job.
  • rule 11: include scenes in as many reader-filled towns as possible.
  • rule 12: give readers versions of themselves, infused with extra awesomeness.
  • rule 13: target key demographics.
  • rule 14: involve music.
  • rule 15: must have obscure, exotic locations.
  • rule 16: include plant names.
from how i became a famous novelist, by steve hely (2009).
Oh oh oh. No matter how satirical this may (not) be, I still used 6, 7, 8 and 9 for my last uni writing project. I’m about to use 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 for the next writing comp. And maybe also 16. (via anquex: booktumbling: janewilkins: ragbag)

Comments (View) | 101 notes
Reblogged from .anquex.
Tags: writing

Monday, June 29th 2009 8:30pm

On burning envy and "I could have written that"

Bennett Madison says something I feel resonates amongst many of us:

The worst and most ironic part is that the closer a book feels to your (my) soul, the more you (I) can’t totally enjoy it.  Peter Cameron’s SOMEDAY THIS PAIN WILL BE USEFUL TO YOU is probably one of the funniest and most moving books I read all last year, but the narrator reminded me so much of myself when I was in high school that I had to get up every few pages and fume over the fact that someone else had written the book that I was meant to write— and worst of all, had done it better than I probably could have.  If I had read the book ten years ago, none of this would have occured to me; I would have just really liked it.  OH LOST INNOCENCE.

What it ultimately means is that I can basically only read things that are either really shitty or things on topics that I don’t care about at all.  Things published before the death of Kurt Cobain/birth of Lourdes Ciccone are usually okay too because somehow that just feels like a whole different category.  As for everything else I have a hard time. 

You would think that this would take the fun out of everything AND IN SOME WAYS IT IS THE SADDEST THING IN THE WORLD, but the flip side is that it does make it much more pleasurable to read stuff that sucks.  Terrible literature makes me feel so great inside.  Airport bookstores are now my favorite.  Happy ending!

Oh I don’t think you’re supposed to take that as a recommendation to throw your highbrow literature out the window and stew in the morass of pulp fiction. But awful (and published!) books might spur you into writing something decent — or so I like to tell myself.

Comments (View) | 6 notes
Tags: writing books

Sunday, June 21st 2009 11:47pm

1:1 Ratio

fiddlersgreen:

A 1:1 ratio of experience to writing means that you’ve become an efficient journalistic machine: nothing you do ever goes to waste. Every single thing you experience gets written about somewhere. It doesn’t have to be experience in the real world; it almost seems like I write, now, about every website I visit too.

Now, a good writer should be able to make anything — even his doubts about writing! — into good grist for his mill. But warning lights should start flashing when you find you’re hardly experiencing anything new because you’re so busy writing entertainingly about the few things you do still have time to experience.

—- click opera

This.

Comments (View) | 16 notes
Reblogged from oh freckle freckle.
Tags: writing hacks

Sunday, June 7th 2009 11:40pm